Wednesday, April 17, 2013

My food isn't pretty, but it tastes damned good.

Jane asked me to make this cake for her birthday:




This is how it turned out.

We used the red velvet cake that I cut away to make the "blood" crumbles.  She loved it.  Yeah, clearly I'm no pro, but it was fun and I'm not interested in all that perfection.  I actually can make cakes look nicer.  I just don't care to...(still not pro)


I did not do the cake from scratch.  I did not have any red dye and it was cheaper to buy a box mix that to gather the ingredients I have run out of in my house.  I did splurge and try a fancy box mix, though.

I admit, it was almost as moist and lovely as a home made cake - which I do prefer to Betty Crocker, Pillsbury, and other box mixes.  It cost me $4 instead of around $1, but when you consider buying a cake (My favorite store cake is $17 from Costco, but that is also among the cheapest) $4 doesn't seem like much.  The frosting is home made cream cheese.  I don't think I've bought canned frosting more than 3 times in my life and every time I'm disappointed so now I refuse.


Yeah, his box seems super pretentious.  I have been avoiding these products popping up all over the place, but I wanted to make a good red velvet cake for her birthday and I did not want to deal with lots of red food coloring so I took my chances.  Also pretty pretentious that it costs 4X more than the cheapest box on the shelf, but it was definitely better than the generic mixes I've tried in the distant past.

Gun Control

A perfect example.



See, I'm not opposed to listening to both sides of an argument.  Maybe that's why I wonder how people think it's so easy to come down on one side or the other of these major debates.  In the case of at least three people I know personally, it's because they listen to their own party's agenda, read their propaganda  and buy unquestioningly into every spin their side puts onto the other side's perfectly good arguments.

So, I watched this whole thing and this is exactly what I'm talking about.  It starts out sounding like a great argument, but within 2 minutes, he's talking as though what the gun control advocates are talking about is *taking away all guns from citizens everywhere*.  People do have the right to protect themselves everywhere and yeah, often a person uses their weapon to defend themselves, but until I hear the gun control opponents talking about this issue in sweeping statements as though the advocates are not talking about taking away ALL guns, we won't get anywhere!

Just like we won't get anywhere if the advocates don't stop saying that taking away high powered rifles is going to solve a damned thing.  Both sides have cute metaphors that make a lot of sense, but neither side actually addresses the real problem.  They talk about taking away guns or not taking away guns.  They say we need to address crime, but don't offer any specific details on how to go about that.  Advocates think better background checks will help, but either way bad people are bad people and will kill.  Guns help.  Not having high powered rifles might slow it down a bit and that sounds damn good when you hear about all the innocent small children recently lost because of high powered weapons.  Still, the argument continues with each side saying the same things over and over again.  Meanwhile, the opposite side isn't asking for the same things.  What they ask changes.  The answer doesn't apply to the new question.  NO ONE IS LISTENING.  They're all too busy trying to figure out what they are going to say that they don't hear the question.

My question?  What ARE you going to do about it?  Stop talking and do something.

Look, the fact is, you are both wrong, but you keep spouting the exact same propaganda over and over which is why WE WILL NEVER GET ANYWHERE.  AT ALL.  EVER.

I am also impressed by this graphic, though it is a little too "advocate" heavy...

My bigger point in posting that is to make the point that we talk and talk and talk about the amendment giving people the right to have guns, but read it, please. The whole thing.  Not just that one line.  Where is the well-regulated militia? How is private gun ownership contributing to the security of freedom?  Remember this amendment was created so that those who had branched out and struggled greatly to establish themselves in what became the US could come together and defend themselves against big bad government at the time - the monarchy.

Of course, no where in there does it take into account the fact that we have so many people and such a poor record on keeping crime at bay that ordinary citizens feel they need to carry a weapon to defend themselves because they can't trust that anyone else will help them...

Monday, April 15, 2013

Last week was Jane's birthday.  She turned 12 which I consider an important birthday.  It feels like the unofficial passage from older child to young adult.  We took her to dinner at Outback so she could try a 'bloomin' onion' which she had heard about on Buffy: The Vampire Slayer - a show she has been enjoying for the last few months.  She loved it, of course, but I just love the fact that when it comes to her birthday and she is allowed to pick a restaurant, she almost always picks something new.

At dinner began the scavenger hunt.  Scott came up with an amazing gift for her - 2 tickets to P!nk - and wanted to make the giving a special event so he created a scavenger hunt where she had to do good deeds in order to earn puzzle pieces which she put together over the weekend and learned about this great gift.  She's a huge fan.  I enjoy her music and attitude a lot, too, so I'll be the adult in charge of taking her.  (I know.  Quite the sacrifice!)  It made her birthday memorable and I hope was a good connection for her and her father.

I'm looking forward to these teenage years.  It's going to be rough, I'm sure, but seeing her grow so far has been pretty amazing.  The next few years will define her future and she has great plans for that.

Friday, April 12, 2013

Advertising...

Hilarious.  I entered a contest using Facebook to win a gift card from Target.  I don't know what made me hit the "comments" on the Target post right afterwards, but I did.

People lose their cool for the dumbest things.  These are examples of the stupidity, but each one has at least a dozen other people saying the exact same things in different words.

1) "Too bad you require birthdate. I wish retailers would realize that not everyone is willing to give out all this personal information so easily online. Would have preferred a drop down menu with age ranges."

You entered your birthday to get a Facebook account, and FB is designed to share your information with more companies than hookers during shore leave.  Additionally, how many FB users get hacked daily?  At least 30% of my FB friends have been hacked at some point or another.  No one using Target has been hacked, to my knowledge.

2) "I would love to enter but DO NOT feel I should have to open my fb file"

Use your brain and read.  It said to link to FB *IF* you want to use FB to fill out your information...for your own convenience. You could type it in yourself if you wanted to do so.

3) "You CANNOT submit unless you grant access to FB friends and contact list. This is an unfortunate scam."

You're wrong.  I unchecked the box and filled out the form and it submitted fine so I think it is user error (read: you are stupid!) that it wouldn't let you submit.  Scam?  Where's the scam?  Too quick to use that word.

4) "This a thinly disguised means at gathering consumer information - right?"

Isn't everything?  Right now, everyone in society is freaking out that companies are gathering information so that they can sell to you.  Admittedly, it's a little creepy when I look at prices for hotels for a vacation, then the next time I am on FB, I get an advert telling you to book a room at the destination you were researching, but that's the nature of the internet beat right now.  Block the cookies that allow tracking and you can't even use FB.  It makes me nervous about personal information, of course, so I am cautious, but look past paranoia and you realize this is how companies are making products that are more specific to *you*.  

I don't like being advertised to all the time.  We're bombarded by things that we like, are useful, and we want or need.  No matter how much money a household makes, there is a way to spend it all, plus more.  Things that used to be free in the world and online are not anymore.  Common courtesy of providing services because you can is gone and every company (and people, too!) are living by the code that you should not provide anything if there is any possible way to charge money for it.  It's the reality of a global economy and fight it all you want, it might be annoying and a huge inconvenience, but at the same time, it is forcing manufacturers to stop thinking about what is convenient for them and focus on what is convenient for their customers.

Additional thought about advertising:
Since the convenience of TiVo/ DVRs have been available, we have seen an increase of banner ads during our television shows.  They grow longer and increasingly imposing.  Years ago, we made fun of the way shows would advertise during the program - made hilarious in Wayne's World as he threw up Doritos, Pizza Hut, etc, and made the advertising obvious.  I know part of the reason this went away was syndication - they had to account for those product placements every time the show airs and also DVD releases.  

On top of that, I used to record my shows and cut commercials so I could enjoy them again later.  I'd cut opening songs and closing credits, too, so that we could fit as much as possible onto a VHS tape.  We remember this, right?  Penny pinchers had to do everything they could to get enjoyment where possible.  Back then, an hour long program took up about 45 minutes.  (Yeah, the old days, it probably took 55 minutes, but hey, I'm not that old.)  Now it's about 42 minutes.  Comedies take little more than twenty minutes.

I have to admit as I lose precious minutes of the best suspense programs and as I see a flashlight come across the screen, flash "in my eyes" and take up 1/3 of the screen, I've been wondering why there can't be new, comprehensive agreements for product placement in our shows to help pay for advertising space.  Personally, I'm cool with seeing my favorite characters eat my least favorite potato chips if it means I get to focus on the actual show and they continue to have time to actually tell their story.  I mean, it's okay right now, but when will the trend take us to shows no longer than an SNL skit?  I may loathe a slippery slope argument, but there it is.

Monday, April 8, 2013

Sports

My daughter wanted to play lacrosse (lax) and I thought "Sure!"  Being educated and informed, I know there are many fantastic benefits of a kid being involved in sports.  She's done karate and swimming so "active" is not new in her list of descriptions, but team sports are a whole new beast.

Team sports.  I don't watch them on telly.   Over the years I've had opportunities to see them live and those are much more interesting to watch, like a play or any live performance, of course, but I don't really care to spend money on these things.  I've been to kids games a couple times to show support.  Before elementary school put Jane on a T-ball team for the summer, but the following year we moved out of the area, she started school, and she progressed in karate then started swimming so I didn't give ball games another thought.  I am neither a sports fan, obviously, but I am also not a part of that subversive group that hates team sports or harbors ill will from either exclusion or bad experiences.

Not that I am free of those, either.  I did like to play basketball in gym at school, but because I was chubby, no one would ever pass me the ball.   I also liked volleyball.  I wasn't very good, but I tried really hard.  Then the girls would make fun of me or rudely say in front of everyone that I shouldn't be allowed to serve because I didn't get it over the net very often.*  I wasn't very good at many group games, but I wasn't that horrible.  Even still, I was outcast for even trying.  Let's not discuss how my weight may have been affected if I just felt included in the sports things, huh?

So when she wanted to start lacrosse, I immediately saw the great things about team sports.  Camaraderie, active lifestyle, clear mind, clear body, watching out for others, integrity; yes I know the list goes on and on.  I knew it meant I had to deal with those particular women who think that pushing their kids in sports meant they love their kid more than I do.  I was ready to sit at games, bored out of my mind, but cheering when my kid made a goal or blocked a pass or whatnot.

What I forgot is the reason why I always felt alienated by "sports" types.  This is different from athletic, I don't know if you've noticed.  An athletic person just uses life as an excuse to play sports.  Sports types are something that I know I'll spend the next few months learning to understand.  I'm hesitant to put my feelings into words because in the near future I might learn a lot more.  For now, I don't think my opinions are negative, but if they are I don't intend them to be.  It seems to me that the sports types are the ones who are amateur cheerleaders.  They are more interested in the sports fashion and a certain look than the actual game.  They focus on raising money, picking uniforms, and thinking that school spirit relates directly to the sports teams - all very important things, but not the only things in life.  Any choice you put first, it feels, that isn't about your kid's sport means you don't care about your kid.  Homework is important, as long as it doesn't interfere with game day schedules.  Money should be endless for sports even if it means giving up everything else.

Everyone's been generally nice.  I know they look at me and hubby and think "fat people=not athletic" which, if they are like me, means "I am not sure how to relate to this person, but let's talk and maybe we'll find something in common!" Sometimes it obviously means "Stupid, lazy, and therefore not really worth my respect, time, conversational skills, or equal treatment."  I'm used to that.  Been true my whole life. 

Still, the first day of practice, we showed up and one of the coaches looked us up and down, then looked at Jane and asked if she had played before.  We said no.  He responded with "well, she looks pretty fit so maybe she'll do okay."  We kindly took the hit and said that she had been in karate before, but is that something he would say to a skinny couple?  For years, I just tried not to see these things and give the benefit of the doubt, but lately, I have started to notice just how much people are totally judgmental of fat people and treat us like, generally, we don't have feelings.  These people are new in our lives and have no idea how much we've lost.  They have no idea that we lead a much healthier lifestyle than, sometimes, they do, but now our bodies have to catch up.

Last weekend, there was a three hour event for all lax players associated with Brighton.  This meant boys and girls in grades 4 though 12th.  They were doing some fundraisers, I knew, which was great because I know lax is recognized by the schools, but not actually sponsored by them so they have to raise a lot of money to play.  Information also said there would be raffle, drills, and more.  We dropped off Jane and her friend, then went to find a parking spot.  Parking was atrocious so we parked elsewhere about half a block away.  This meant it took about 5 minutes to get back to the park and by then, they were doing catch drills with some older girls which I thought was awesome of them.  I like two of them because the one was being friendly.  She asked the other youth questions like what's your name?  What other sports do you like?  Do you enjoy school?  The other girl was being a real mentor.  "If you do this when you catch the ball, then you're ready to throw faster."  And she did it very sweet so that it didn't feel like she was criticizing the girl, just making her a better player.

Jane's counterpart was talking to her friend the entire time about school drama.  Don't know if Jane learned a thing, but at least she played catch.  I watched and now I think I'm going to hit the thrift shops and garage sales to see if I can find a stick so I can practice with Jane to the best of my ability.  Better than nothing, I figure.  I can't run and scrimmage and I'm not the best catcher, but I can definitely be someone to keep the ball moving.

Later, these same girls were out on the street selling blankets to raise funds (a $20 minky for $55 because it says Bengals! and, you know, if it says something about the school, it's for sports.  Don't see anyone selling these items at German Club, but whatever.)  It was in that moment that I realized where 'Woo Girls' (search HIMYM if this is an unfamiliar term) come from and where they go.  They are not just women on the town who have nothing going so they have to woo.  No, they start out on the side of the road trying to entice drivers to honk in support of the teams, buy blankets, and instead of yelling "Come get your car washed by a cheerleader!" they just yell "WOOOO!!!!"

Then they must go through the phase discussed on How I Met Your Mother and the next thing you know, they are soccer moms.  "Wooo!" = someone bought a bake sale cupcake!  "Woooo!" = someone showed up at practice!

I don't woo.  I am not like Lily who was willing to try.  Okay, I take that back.  If I was out in public and someone said the new episode of Doctor Who was going to be written by Douglas Adams third cousin, I would definitely yell "WOOO!" but my sports related woos tend to be a lot more subdued.  They won't be for Jane's big moments, I hope, but in generally, I just don't get that thrilled.

This weekend, they've been trying to drum up interest in some Ice Breaker Tournament.  Well, we are just barely past paying for equipment, practice clothes, three types of registration (each with their own fee) and all the other ways that putting your kids into sports sucks up any extra money you have unless you happen to be a larger income household.  They did not tell us what is involved with this tournament, what times it takes place, or anything other than it is on Thursday (Jane's birthday), Friday (the day we were going to take her out for a special dinner) and Saturday (the day we were going to spend cleaning for her party, baking her birthday cake, and sending her on a scavenger hunt for a super special gift Scott bought her).  The timing sucks for that reason, but I told her if she wants to do it, we will do it.  Of course, it's yet another fee.  I am not quite sure where I will pull it from, because with all these things, it's not like we ever have a chance to put money into some magical savings account, but it's also not like we're struggling SO hard that we can't come up with it.  I'm just annoyed because it's ANOTHER FEE.  $$$$$$$$   Who says it's the last?  Are they going to start emailing in two weeks about some other special thing that's great for the girls that only costs another $40, $60, whatever number of dollars?  It's "only" a certain number of dollars to you guys, okay?  We spend our money on other things besides sports like books so stop saying its "only" this amount when it all adds together until it's just not possible to squeeze another dollar out of us.  I mean, with the internet, everyone charges some fee to participate, a small fee, but it all adds up.  I don't fall into that advertising so I don't like feeling manipulated here.

We told Jane that getting into this tournament means cancelling other plans this week.  She told her friend she doesn't know if she wants to do it, so her friend argues why she can still make it work with all these other plans.  She can say she isn't all that experienced and they'll argue it's good practice.  This is another point of contention I feel with all people these days, not just the sport types.  Those of us raised with good manners have a hard time saying "no" so we say "we have to wash our hair" er, I mean, "I'm not that experienced and it says it's for people who know what they are doing", "I have other plans", and other polite excuses, but these day, people don't take a hint.  They just argue their point until you say no.  Well, that's a mannerism I'm okay to lose (I am less flexible about losing manners like how to behave in a nice restaurant and how to treat people who are different...) so I told her if she wants to say no, it's okay to just say no.  I have a feeling her friends will talk her into it anyway.  This is what "nice girls" get.  If she ends up doing something she isn't sure she wants to do and has to give up doing the things she wants to do, isn't that a cousin to bullying?

I feel like we are stuck in a world where people are finally eschewing the tight bounds of spending their lives pleasing other people, but instead of compromising, they just all want it their way now and the meek are left to give in.  The loud don't listen to the quiet because they feel the quiet should be loud if they want anything.  Who decided pushy is the better way to be?  We teach our kids to be assertive, then are surprised when they get confused and turn into bullies.  We call it confidence to steamroll over others, and are then hurt when someone steamrolls over us.

I hope Jane loves playing lacrosse, but it's equally important to me that she not only does well in school, but that she excels.  I've always felt people lose sight of intelligence when sports enter the picture.  Athletes can be intelligent, of course, but is it the priority?  Or do sports become the priority?  And should they?  In this world where people criticize weight and claim it's about health, where do those whose heart race at a good book or live for writing or art fit in?


*Personal side-track: The part where I hold ill will is that one gym teacher used this as the reason she marked me down for my gym grades.  She specifically said it was because I didn't ever have the ball in my hands.  With volleyball, I started counting other people and observed that if you are skinny and NEVER get it over the net, this is less reason to be teased that being fat and only doing it 30% of the time.  I always kinda felt that the other kids should have been marked down for not including me, but gym grades can't be based on test scores, so the question becomes what should they be based upon?  Supposedly, they we going to be based on improvement in those presidential workouts like doing more situps in a minute and running the mile faster, but not all of my teachers did so.  The one that really made me mad was that I would get up and participate every single day.  One girl used her menses for a week every month, stood around, often sat in the corner and hid from the games, and generally tried not to be seen not participating and received a higher grade.  I do not think we should ever get rid of gym class, but I don't think a person's grade should depend on their looks.